Change In Value Of Split-Interest Agreements

General structure of a lead trust for an NFP organization: assets such as cash or shares are brought by the donor to control of the NFP organization (either by the role of the NFP organization as a trustee of a trust holding the assets, or directly by the organization NFP, which holds the assets as the general heritage of its organization). The NFP organization receives periodic cash payments (Lead interest) which are either a fixed dollar amount or a certain percentage of the fair value of assets at the beginning of each period. (Note: some of the assets can be liquidated to make the necessary payments.) If the contract is terminated, the remaining assets are reset to the donor`s donor or beneficiary (the rest of the interest). For the duration of the agreement, the NFP organization is responsible for the remaining interests. The responsibility of the NFP organization for its obligation to the donor`s donor or beneficiary is based in part on the fair value of the assets. After the initial registration of irrevocable inter-state interest agreements, an organization must detect different transactions and events during the term of the contract. Where assets brought in under an irrevocable inter-institutional agreement are held or controlled by a third party, the organization should account for changes in the fair value of their economic interests using the same valuation technique it originally used to measure economic interests. However, where the organization is fiduciary, the assessment of liabilities is changed by: (a) amortization of the rebate put in place to account for fair value of benefits receivable and (b) reassessments of future payments to beneficiaries on the basis of changes in life expectancy and other actuarial assumptions, unless the valuation objective is fair value. The responsibility of the NFP organization for its obligation to the donor`s donor or beneficiary under an irrevocable inter-institutional demerger agreement should be analysed to determine whether it is eligible for the waiver in paragraph 10, paragraph (c), without that responsibility being subject to the requirements of Declaration 133. If the obligation. B is exclusively related to life (i.e.

dependent on the overload of an identified person, in this case payments are made only if the person is alive at the time of payment), this obligation would be eligible for the waiver provided in paragraph 10, point c). This conclusion is consistent with the guidelines of Question 4 of Statement 133 Implementation Question B25, “Deferred Variable Seniority Contracts with Other Payment Methods at the End of the Accumulation Period.” Where the responsibility of the PNP organization for the commitment of the interest-splitting organization is not likely to benefit from the waiver under paragraph 10, (c) since the agreement is not exclusively related to life, the PFNP organization must determine whether this liability meets the definition of a derivative in its entirety in paragraph 6 or whether it includes an embedded derivative instrument that could justify separate accounting referred to in paragraph 12 unless it a fair value choice is made in accordance with Statement 155. Chapter 6 of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Not-for-Profit Organizations (NFP Guide), deals with the accounting of irrevocable agreements of full interest by NFP organizations. In an irrevocable split interest agreement, the donor may give the NFP organization the right to control the assets paid by appointing it (1) trustee of the trust holding the assets, or (2) by giving them the right to hold the assets as general assets of their organization.

Non classé